Bloomberg Regology is the platform formerly sold as Regology, acquired by Bloomberg Industry Group and now sold alongside its legal, tax and policy intelligence. It positions itself as three AI agents — regulatory change, compliance workflow, and research — over a database of more than 10,000 sources in over 135 countries.
| Bloomberg Regology | nimmy | |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory sources | 10,000+ | 1,005 catalogued, 200 crawled |
| Countries | 135+ | 32 jurisdictions with a document indexed |
| GRC | Integrates with GRC systems | Is the GRC system |
| Backing | Bloomberg Industry Group | Independent, in pilot |
Where they are clearly ahead
Breadth, and the thing behind the breadth. Bloomberg Industry Group brings legal and tax intelligence that sits next to the regulatory feed, and for an organisation whose questions cross those boundaries that adjacency is worth more than any feature comparison will show. If your compliance question is frequently also a tax question, we are not competing for that.
They also state that 100% of applicable laws are identified on the platform. We would not make that claim about our own index, and we would want to understand exactly how it is scoped before relying on it — but it is their claim to make and defend, and we are not in a position to contradict it.
Where we differ by design
Regology generates obligations, risks, controls and policies from regulatory content and integrates with GRC systems to manage them. That is a sensible architecture, and it assumes the system of record is somewhere else.
We are the system of record. The obligation register is the hinge of the product: a requirement you carry, from a regulation or a contract or a licence or one of your own policies, mapped per entity to the policies and controls that cover it, with whatever nothing covers becoming an issue with an owner and a date. Regulatory change feeds that register; it is not the whole of it.
And we keep the page. Every document we fetch is stored and versioned, so what a regulator changed after publishing is a diff we can show you rather than a thing you discover later.
Which one to buy
Choose Bloomberg Regology
- You need global coverage. 135+ countries against our 32 is the whole argument and it is a good one.
- Your regulatory questions sit next to legal and tax questions, and having them on one contract matters.
- You want an established vendor with an enterprise procurement process behind it.
- You already have a GRC platform and are buying intelligence to feed it.
- You need to buy now, rather than joining a pilot.
Choose nimmy
- You want the register, the controls and the changes to them in one place, with one audit trail.
- You need evidence of what a source said when you relied on it, not a link to what it says today.
- Your obligations come from contracts, licences and your own policies as much as from regulators, and you want them on one register.
- You are an advisory firm running client workspaces rather than an in-house team buying seats.
- You want to see the source document behind every date, and to know what we have deliberately left out.
Bloomberg Regology figures are as published at regology.com and read on 18 September 2026; they may have changed since, and their site is the authority on them. nimmy figures are counted from our own index on 18 September 2026. Nothing here is a statement about the quality of their product, which we have not used.